.............
Mal die Nebensächlichkeit, dass ich nicht "sofort" gewonnen habe, beiseite gelassen. Ich hätte auch ohne GC in den USA leben und arbeiten können. Aber das nur am Rande. Und mein Wechsel in die USA war auch ohne GC geplant und von langer Hand vorbereitet. Die Lotterie war ein einfacher Weg zur GC, den ich natürlich dankend gegangen bin. Klar, ich hätte natürlich auch eine Scheinfirma gründen, ein Investoren-E beantragen, mich als erfolgloser Lobbyist registrieren, regelmäßig zum Pfannkuchenfrühstück meines örtlichen Rotary-Clubs gehen, zwischendurch ein paar ahnungslose Neu-Forenuser über den Löffel ziehen und 'nen schließlich 'nen Schulbusführerschein machen können - aber warum will man das, wann es auch einfacher geht?
............
Und dafür gibt es dann ein NIW ?????? ---- Der war wirklich gut, Emma!
Und was bitte ist da in Richtung "Nusskiller" irgendwie impliziert, wenn ich wertfrei feststelle, dass EB-1a nun wirklich nicht leicht zu erreichen ist?
You must meet 3 of 10 criteria* below, or provide evidence of a one-time achievement (i.e., Pulitzer, Oscar, Olympic Medal)
* Criteria for Demonstrating Extraordinary Ability
You must meet 3 out of the 10 listed criteria below to prove extraordinary ability in your field:
- Evidence of receipt of lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
- Evidence of your membership in associations in the field which demand outstanding achievement of their members
- Evidence of published material about you in professional or major trade publications or other major media
- Evidence that you have been asked to judge the work of others, either individually or on a panel
- Evidence of your original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance to the field
- Evidence of your authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
- Evidence that your work has been displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases
- Evidence of your performance of a leading or critical role in distinguished organizations
- Evidence that you command a high salary or other significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field
- Evidence of your commercial successes in the performing arts
Employment-Based Immigration: First Preference EB-1 | USCIS
Das gleiche bei NIW. Auch dort habe ich "Nusskiller" nicht mal erwähnt. Klar, EB-2 ist leichter zu erreichen als EB-1a. Bleibt dann bloss das NIW. Gut, das gibt es ja deiner Meinung fast als Zugabe.
Lies mal:
National Interest Waiver | USCIS
[TABLE="class: layoutTable"]
[TR]
[TD] Below are some key requirements you must fulfill to demonstrate that your request to waive the job offer requirement and, therefore, the labor certification, is in the "national interest." For each requirement, we have included forms of evidence that you may submit to meet the requirement and other tips to help you prepare your petition.
As there is no statutory or regulatory definition of the term “national interest”, USCIS relies on a 1998 Administrative Appeals Office precedent decision setting forth a three-prong test for evaluating requests for a national interest waiver. See Matter of New York State Department of Transportation, 22 I&N Dec. 215 (Comm’r 1998) (“NYSDOT”). These three prongs are outlined below.[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 3"]
| Requirement 1 - You must show that you plan on working in the United States in an area of substantial intrinsic merit. |
Under the first prong of the NYSDOT test, it is important for you to focus on the proposed employment. USCIS will look at your documents to determine whether the importance of your proposed work is readily apparent. Some of the evidence you may submit to demonstrate that you plan on working in the United States in an area of substantial intrinsic merit includes:
- A letter from you and/or your company describing the work and its importance
- Articles or other published media discussing your and/or your company’s work and its importance
- Letters from experts in the field attesting to your work and its importance
- Testimonial letters should include information about the expert’s own credentials, such as a C.V.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 3"]
| Requirement 2: You must show that the proposed impact of your work is national in scope. |
While your employment may be limited to a particular geographic area, you must establish a benefit to more than a particular region of the country. Under the second prong of the
NYSDOT test, you must demonstrate that the proposed benefit to be provided will be national in scope. USCIS will give due consideration to entrepreneurs who establish that their entrepreneurial enterprise will serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than the work of others in the same field. Some of the evidence you may submit to demonstrate that the proposed impact of your work is national in scope includes:
- Published articles or media reports
- Copies of contracts, agreements, or licenses showing the scope and impact
- Letters from current and former employers discussing your work and its national importance
- Letters from experts in the field attesting to your work and its national importance
- Testimonial letters should include information about the expert’s own credentials, such as a C.V.
[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD="colspan: 3"]
| Requirement 3: You must show waiving the labor certification requirement would benefit the national interests of the United States. |
The purpose of the labor certification process is to protect the national interests of the United States by ensuring that the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers employed in the same field would not be adversely affected. Thus, when deciding whether to grant a waiver of the labor certification requirement, USCIS looks at all of the evidence to see whether the national benefits you offer are so great that they outweigh the national interests inherent in the labor certification process. This means that your evidence must show that you serve the national interest to a substantially greater extent than the majority of your colleagues and that you have a degree of influence on your field that distinguishes you from your colleagues. The national interest evaluation is prospective. This means you must show that you have a past record of specific prior achievements that indicate future benefits to the national interests of the United States.
Demonstrating that your business enterprise will create jobs for U.S. workers or otherwise enhance the welfare of the United States may qualify you for an NIW. However, you still have to show that the creation of jobs domestically for U.S. workers may serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than the work of others in the same field.
Some of the evidence you may submit to demonstrate that waiving the labor certification requirement would benefit the national interests of the United States includes:
- Copies of published articles that cite or otherwise recognize your achievements
- Copies of grants or other funding you received listing the amount and terms of the grants, as well as the principal and co-investigators
- Documents showing how your work is being implemented by others, for example:
- Contracts with companies using your or your company’s products
- Documents showing licensed technology that you and/or your company invented or co-invented, and how that licensed technology is being used by others
- Patents or licenses awarded to you and/or your company with documents showing how they are being used and why they are significant to your field
[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
Was bitte ist denn daran schwammig? Wahrscheinlich empfindest nur du das so. Denn jeder normale Mensch sieht doch eigentlich sonnenklar, worauf es dabei ankommt. Der normale E2-Investor wird das alles wohl kaum erfüllen. Richtig ist, dass es trotzdem geht. Siehst du ja an mir. Aber ein "Silbernes Pferdchen" reicht da sicher nur zum Hoppel-Poppel und nicht zum NIW. Macht aber nichts. Denn, wie du ja weisst, gibt es dann ja immer noch das GC Glücksspiel, das uns Leute wie dich ins Land spült, die sonst keine andere Chance auf eine GC gehabt hätten!
Anyway, es geht ja auch nicht darum, dass Nusskiller seinen falschen Link durch einen völlig selbstverständlichen Link (I-140 Petition) ersetzt hat, der ja nun tatsächlich für jede job related GC notwendig ist. Sondern dass er da irgend etwas erzählt, man könne nach 5 Jahren mit
Dieses Arbeitgebergestütze E1 - Achtung: nicht verwechseln mit den TreatyTrader! - hat den Vorteil, dass man selbst nach 5 Jahren auf Greencard gehen kann:
Green Card for International Organization Employees | USCIS
irgendwie eine GC erreichen ....
Was bitte meint er denn deiner Meinung nach ???? E1, EB-1 oder was denn nun ????
OK, mir ist das im Prinzip ja gar nicht so wichtig. Aber Anjaxxo hatte mich ja aufgefordert zur Klarstellung. Dem bin ich ruhig und sachlich nachgekommen. Auch die verschiedenen "Likes" für deine Hasstiraden gegen mich können den neutralen Leser nicht darüber täuschen, wie gefärbt deine Beiträge doch sind. Im Gegensatz zu mir geht es dir nicht um Information, sondern nur um Diskreditierung meiner Person. ..... Macht mir nichts ! Denn du stellst dir dein eigenes Zeugnis dadurch nur selbst aus. Danke dafür! Besser hätte ich es selbst nicht machen können.
